Skip to content
APDD
See my library

Concept

Loss aversion

A loss affects us more than a gain of the same size, so we tend to avoid losing even if it means giving up a bigger gain.

In Spanish
Aversión a la pérdida
Origin
Kahneman and Tversky (1979)

What problem it addresses

It explains why we turn down favorable bets, struggle to let go of what we have and react more to what we lose than to what we gain.

An example

You are offered a coin toss. If it’s heads, you win $150. If it’s tails, you lose $100.

What the math saysWin$150Lose$100
On average you win $25 per toss. It pays to play.
What we feelWin$150Lose$100 that feels like about $225
The loss weighs more than the gain. We don’t play.

It’s a favorable bet, but most people turn it down (Kahneman, 2011).

Why it happens

  1. We measure changes relative to what we already have, not the total amount.

  2. Dropping below that point is felt more than rising by the same amount.

  3. That’s why we avoid risks even when they suit us, and struggle to let go of what is already ours.

Applications in design

  • Use it like this

    If it protects the person, tell them what they would lose by not acting: “Turn on backup so you don’t lose your photos.”

  • Avoid

    Fake countdowns and offers that claim to expire and don’t.

  • Don’t fall for it

    Swap “lose” for “gain” in the message. If it stops convincing you, it was the fear of losing.

×2.25

What the research says

That’s how much more losses weigh than gains of the same size, according to Tversky and Kahneman (1992).

Debated evidence. It has been replicated many times, but when it appears and how strong it is are debated: Gal and Rucker (2018) question whether it is a general principle.

Authors and works

  1. 1979

    Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky

    Described it as part of prospect theory.

  2. 1992

    Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman

    Estimated that a loss weighs about 2.25 times more than an equal gain.

Sources

Original sources

Academic reviews

Secondary sources

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Last reviewed: