Confirmation bias
We seek, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms what we already believe.
What problem it addresses
Explains why it is so hard to change our minds and why research can end up seeing only what it expected.
An example
You are told the sequence 2, 4, 6 follows a rule. You can propose other sequences to discover it.
Most people only tested sequences that confirmed their idea. To discover the rule, you had to look for one that disproved it.
Why it happens
We form an idea very quickly.
We look for cases that confirm it, not cases that test it.
Each confirmation makes us more confident, even though it proves nothing.
Applications in design
Use it like this
In research, deliberately look for what contradicts your hypothesis.
Avoid
Designing interviews or surveys with questions that lead to the expected answer.
Don’t fall for it
Before deciding, write down what evidence would make you change your mind.
6 of 29
What the research says
That is how many participants got the rule right on the first try. Most first announced some wrong rule (Wason, 1960).
Solid evidence. Nickerson (1998) reviewed decades of studies and described it as a bias present in many domains.
Connections
Used in
Authors and works
- 1960
Peter Wason
Created the 2, 4, 6 task.
- 1998
Raymond Nickerson
Reviewed the research on the bias across many domains.
Sources
Original sources
- Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. View source: Wason, P. C. (1960)
Academic reviews
- Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. View source: Nickerson, R. S. (1998)
Last reviewed: