Personas
A method for summarizing research in a few fictional characters, with a name, goals and context, who represent groups of users.
What it’s for
Helps the team design for specific people rather than a generic user whom everyone imagines differently.
Key elements
Based on research
Each character comes from what was observed, not from assumptions.
Few
A handful of personas, each with different goals and context.
Useful for deciding
They only include details that help make design decisions.
An example
Two ways of talking about users in a meeting.
Personas give the team a shared reference for who they are designing for.
How it’s done
Research with real users.
Group similar goals and behaviors.
Each group becomes a character.
Applications in design
When to use it
When the team has many design decisions to make and needs to keep real people in mind in each of them.
Avoid
Making them up in an afternoon or filling them with stereotypes and details that don't help decide.
Don’t fall for it
Remember they are a summary: they don't replace talking to real people.
Connections
Builds on
Authors and works
- 1999
Alan Cooper
Popularized personas in The Inmates Are Running the Asylum.
- 2003
John Pruitt and Jonathan Grudin
Showed how to use them in large teams, based on their work at Microsoft.
- 2006
Christopher Chapman and Russell Milham
Argued that two teams with the same data would not arrive at the same personas, and that there is no way to check whether they represent anyone real.
Sources
Original sources
- Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Sams.
- Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003). Personas: Practice and theory. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX). ACM. View source: Pruitt, J., & Grudin, J. (2003)
Academic reviews
- Chapman, C. N., & Milham, R. P. (2006). The personas' new clothes: Methodological and practical arguments against a popular method. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(5), 634–636. View source: Chapman, C. N., & Milham, R. P. (2006)
Last reviewed: