Skip to content
APDD
See my library

Plan a research study

To decide what to research, with which method, and how to turn it into useful conclusions. In each step, choose one or more entries; open “How it’s used” to decide without leaving this page.

  1. Step 1

    Decide what you want to know

    A good research question determines the method.

    How it’s used

    Two complementary ways of doing research: qualitative seeks to understand why and how; quantitative, to measure how much and how often.

    Why it happens

    1. Quantitative research answers how much? how many? how often?
    2. Qualitative research answers why? how? what does it mean?
    3. Together they give a fuller, more reliable picture.
    Avoid
    Using five interviews to estimate how many people think something: that’s not what they’re for.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    The gap between what people say about their behavior and motives, and what they actually do.

    Why it happens

    1. We don't see everything that influences our decisions.
    2. When asked, we give an explanation that sounds reasonable.
    3. That is why you have to observe, as well as ask.
    Avoid
    Taking literally what people say they would do with a product that does not exist yet.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    Understanding customers by the progress they are trying to make in a specific situation, the “job” they hire a product for, not by their demographics.

    How it’s done

    1. Look at the situation. When, where and with whom the product is chosen.
    2. Find the job. What progress is sought and what alternatives are used.
    3. Design for that job. Improve what matters in that situation.
    Avoid
    Confusing the job with a product feature.
    Full entry, with sources
  2. Step 2

    Choose how to get the information

    Ask, observe, or measure: each approach sees different things.

    How it’s used

    A long, open, guided conversation with a single person to understand in detail their experiences, motivations and way of seeing a topic.

    How it’s done

    1. Prepare a guide of topics, not a closed questionnaire.
    2. Have a conversation following what the person tells you.
    3. Record and analyze looking for themes and quotes.
    Output
    Detailed accounts of experiences and motivations
    Avoid
    Asking for general opinions instead of concrete stories (“the last time you…”), asking leading questions or selling your idea.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    A method in which people are observed and asked questions while they carry out their tasks in their own setting, like an apprentice beside a master.

    How it’s done

    1. You accompany the person while they do their real work.
    2. You ask in the moment, without interrupting too much.
    3. You interpret with them what you have observed.
    Output
    Notes on how a person works in their setting, and why
    Avoid
    Turning it into a sit-down interview far from where everything happens: ask the person to show you how they do it, as if you were going to learn their job.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    An observation method in which you accompany a person for a period, like their shadow, to see what they do, with whom, and why.

    How it’s done

    1. Agree with the person when and for how long to accompany them.
    2. Observe and note what they do, with whom, and where.
    3. Ask afterward about what was not clear.
    Output
    Notes on a person’s complete routine
    Avoid
    Intervening or giving opinions while you observe: it changes what the person does.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    Participants record their activities, experiences or emotions over a period at the moment they happen, using text, photos or audio.

    How it’s done

    1. Give the instructions. What to record, when and with what.
    2. Follow along. Reminders and review of what comes in each day.
    3. Close with an interview. Talk with each person about their diary.
    Output
    Records of activities and emotions noted in the moment
    Avoid
    Asking for too much each day: people stop writing.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    A questionnaire with the same questions for many people, designed to measure in numbers how many think, do or prefer something.

    How it’s done

    1. Define what to measure. Which decision depends on the answer.
    2. Write and test. Test the questionnaire with a few people before sending it.
    3. Send and analyze. Count, compare groups and read carefully.
    Output
    Numerical data on what many people think, do or prefer
    Avoid
    Asking about what they will do in the future (“would you use it?”): what people say they will do isn’t what they later do.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    A conversation led by a moderator with a small group on a specific topic, to learn their opinions and how they build them by talking to each other.

    How it’s done

    1. Prepare. A topic guide and the stimulus to be shown.
    2. Moderate. Open the conversation and share out the turns.
    3. Analyze. Look for themes, agreements and disagreements.
    Output
    A group’s opinions and how they build them through conversation
    Avoid
    Using it to measure how many people prefer something: it is small and the group sways opinions.
    Full entry, with sources
  3. Step 3

    Make sure it is reliable

    Know when to stop and how to cross-check what you find.

    How it’s used

    The point where new interviews or observations add almost no new themes. It helps decide how many people to interview.

    Why it happens

    1. The first interviews uncover almost all the themes.
    2. Each additional interview repeats what you already knew.
    3. When nothing new appears, you have reached saturation.
    Avoid
    Using “five users” as a fixed rule for any kind of research.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    Using several sources, methods, researchers, or theories to study the same thing and check whether the results agree.

    Why it happens

    1. Each source has its own biases.
    2. By cross-checking them, the biases of one offset those of another.
    3. What agrees is more reliable; what does not is worth investigating.
    Avoid
    Looking only for sources that confirm what you already thought.
    Full entry, with sources
  4. Step 4

    Organize what you learned

    Go from many notes to patterns.

    How it’s used

    Writing each research observation on a note and grouping the notes by affinity, bottom-up, until the themes that connect them emerge.

    How it’s done

    1. Write one observation on each note.
    2. Group the notes that are alike, without prior categories.
    3. Give a title to each group and arrange the groups.
    Output
    Observations grouped into themes
    Avoid
    Starting with categories already decided: that way you only confirm what you believed.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    The process of organizing, grouping, and interpreting what has been researched until patterns, insights, and design opportunities emerge.

    Why it happens

    1. Get all the information out while it is fresh.
    2. Group and regroup it, looking for patterns and differences.
    3. Interpret it until insights and opportunities are formulated.
    Avoid
    Jumping from data to solutions without going through interpretation.
    Full entry, with sources
  5. Step 5

    Tell it so it gets used

    Turn the patterns into something the team will remember.

    How it’s used

    A new, well-grounded interpretation about people and their context that explains why they do what they do and opens design opportunities.

    Why it happens

    1. Start from observed facts, never from assumptions.
    2. Connect several findings until a common motive emerges.
    3. Phrase it as desire and friction: what the person wants and what stops them.
    Avoid
    Calling a piece of data or a team opinion an insight.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    A method for summarizing research in a few fictional characters, with a name, goals and context, who represent groups of users.

    How it’s done

    1. Research with real users.
    2. Group similar goals and behaviors.
    3. Each group becomes a character.
    Output
    A few fictional characters, with a name, goals and context
    Avoid
    Making them up in an afternoon or filling them with stereotypes and details that don't help decide.
    Full entry, with sources
    How it’s used

    A method for representing a person's path through a service, step by step, with their actions, touchpoints, emotions and pain points.

    How it’s done

    1. Research with real people, not imagined ones.
    2. Draw the journey with its emotions and pain points.
    3. Choose the moments most worth improving.
    Output
    A step-by-step map of the journey, with actions, touchpoints, emotions and pain points
    Avoid
    Drawing it from the office without talking to anyone: it will be the team's opinion, not the real experience.
    Full entry, with sources